The corresponding author must submit the article through the journal’s online system and is responsible for following up the submission throughout the review process.
The corresponding author must ensure that all contributing authors are listed in the correct order and that all authors have read and approved the submitted version of the article.
The Editor will conduct an initial evaluation of the article and verify its compliance with all submission requirements published on the journal’s website.
The submitted article will be checked for plagiarism and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (AI).
A copy of the article, without the authors’ names or other identifying information, will be sent to Editorial Board members with relevant expertise in the research topic to determine whether the article meets the journal’s publication criteria, which are as follows:
The article’s topic falls within the journal’s areas of research and specialization.
The article demonstrates originality and makes an original contribution to its field.
The author(s) have complied with the journal’s publication guidelines and submission requirements.
The article complies with established standards of research ethics and academic integrity.
The article is written in clear, accurate, and appropriate scholarly language.
The article complies with the journal’s requirements regarding plagiarism and the use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The article has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.
If the article does not meet the above publication criteria, it will be rejected following the initial evaluation by the Editorial Board.
If the article meets the journal’s publication criteria, the Editorial Board will nominate at least two expert reviewers with relevant expertise in the article’s field of research. The reviewers must have academic qualifications and expertise at least comparable to those
of the author(s) and must have no conflict of interestwith the authors or the submitted article.
After completing the evaluation, each reviewer will provide one of the following recommendations:
Acceptance without revisions
Acceptance subject to minor revisions
Acceptance subject to major revisions
Rejection
If the reviewers require revisions, the author(s) will be asked to revise the article in accordance with their comments and recommendations. The revised version must be uploaded to the journal’s online system and returned to the reviewers for further evaluation. The review and revision process may involve up to three rounds before a final decision is reached.
If the reviewers’ recommendations are conflicting, the article will be sent to a third reviewer. The final decision will then be made after considering the third reviewer’s recommendation.
The final decision to accept or reject the article will be made by the Editor-in-Chief in consultation with the Editorial Board.
 (28).png)